Billionaire Chip Wilson Faces $600 Fine for Unauthorized Election Sign Against BC NDP
Chip Wilson Fined by Elections B.C. Over Unauthorized Election Signs at Vancouver Mansion
Chip Wilson’s Election Sign Controversy in Vancouver
Billionaire and Lululemon founder, Chip Wilson, has been found to have violated third-party election advertising rules during the 2024 provincial election campaign. Elections B.C. revealed that Wilson displayed unauthorized election signs outside his Vancouver mansion, accusing the NDP of being “communist” without following the proper registration process.
Elections B.C. Investigation and Penalty
According to a letter from Elections B.C., Wilson failed to register as a third-party advertiser under the Elections Act, despite erecting three political signs on his property. Upon cooperation with the investigation, Wilson eventually registered on October 10, 2024. As a result, he was fined $600 for his contravention of the law.
Details of the Unauthorized Signs
The investigation began after the appearance of a sign outside Wilson’s $82 million mansion, which accused Premier David Eby of labeling Conservatives as “Far Right” while ignoring claims against the NDP. Two additional signs were reported, one without proper authorization, stating financial concerns about Eby’s governance. Wilson’s expenditure on these signs amounted to $1,650.
Implications and Reactions
Wilson’s infraction could have resulted in a maximum penalty of $10,000. However, Elections B.C. noted he “may have been unaware” of registration requirements, as a first-time advertising sponsor. Despite the signs’ substantial reach, Wilson complied quickly after being alerted. He now has 40 days to pay the penalty.
Public and Political Reactions
Premier David Eby reacted to the controversy by referencing Wilson’s wealth, suggesting it may have skewed his perspective. The neighborhood was stirred when Wilson’s mansion, the most expensive residential property in B.C., and the signs, were vandalized with graffiti labeling him a “selfish billionaire.” Wilson has not responded publicly to the fine.
Academic Perspective on the Ruling
University of British Columbia political science lecturer Stewart Prest addressed the complexity of enforcing election rules. He acknowledged Wilson’s clear contravention of the Elections Act while questioning the effectiveness of a $600 fine on a billionaire. Prest warned of the fine line between enforcing regulations and stifling free expression, suggesting that the penalty might inadvertently amplify Wilson’s message.
