Jurors Reveal Bullying During Harvey Weinstein Trial Say Lawyers as Conviction Regret Surfaces
Two jurors involved in the Harvey Weinstein trial have expressed regret over their decision to convict him, alleging they were bullied during deliberations. In a recent court filing, Weinstein’s legal team argued that the jury’s verdict was the result of “threats, intimidation, and extraneous bias.”
Background of the Case
Harvey Weinstein, the former Hollywood mogul, was found guilty of first-degree criminal sex acts related to an incident with production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006. Weinstein’s conviction has significant implications, particularly in the context of the #MeToo movement, where it initially represented a landmark moment.
Jurors’ Claims of Intimidation
According to sworn affidavits from two jurors, they felt overwhelmed and intimidated by other jurors who seemed adamant about convicting Weinstein. One juror reported being screamed at, while another noted that any dissenting opinion was met with hostility.
- “We have to get rid of you,” was one comment directed at a juror.
- Another juror mentioned a desire for a secret ballot, believing it would have led to a not guilty verdict.
Both jurors claimed that intimidation shifted the deliberations from an even split to a unanimous verdict. They feared for their safety and that of the jury foreperson, particularly after aggressive confrontations occurred during the discussions.
The Mistrial and Ongoing Legal Battles
Weinstein was acquitted of charges involving another woman, Kaja Sokola, and a mistrial was declared on the count relating to former actor Jessica Mann after the foreperson declined to continue deliberating. Now, Weinstein’s defense, led by attorney Arthur Aidala, aims to have his conviction overturned, challenging the fairness of the trial.
Upcoming Decisions
Judge Curtis Farber has directed Manhattan prosecutors to conduct an investigation, with a ruling on the case expected by December 22. This timing also coincides with the reelection of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, which adds further complexity to the proceedings.
Concerns Over Jury Conduct
During the trial, the jurors raised issues about their deliberation environment. One stated that civility was often disregarded, with threats of violence made. Moreover, suspicions emerged within the jury regarding possible outside influence on another juror’s decision.
Weinstein has consistently denied all charges against him. The first-degree criminal sex act conviction could result in a 25-year prison sentence, while the unresolved third-degree rape charge carries a potential four-year penalty. Weinstein has been incarcerated since his initial conviction in 2020 and is appealing a separate California case.
