Kent Police Issue Apology to Protester Threatened Over Palestine Flag Display
A recent incident involving a Kent protester has ignited discussions surrounding free speech and police actions during demonstrations related to sensitive political issues. Laura Murton, a 43-year-old activist, received an official apology and compensation from Kent Police following a confrontation that occurred on July 14, 2025, in Canterbury. This apology comes after Murton was threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act while displaying a Palestine flag and holding signs supporting Gaza.
Details of the Incident
- Date: July 14, 2025
- Location: Canterbury, Kent
- Protester: Laura Murton
- Police Action: Threatened arrest under the Terrorism Act
- Police Response: Official apology and compensation
During the protest, armed officers accused Murton of being affiliated with Palestine Action, a group that had been banned just weeks prior. The situation resulted in significant public and political backlash after media coverage highlighted the incident. As a result, the matter was discussed in Parliament and led to judicial reviews regarding the proscription of Palestine Action.
Police Apology and Compensation
Chief Constable Tim Smith acknowledged in a letter to Murton that her rights to free speech had been violated. He admitted that the officers had acted outside established national counter-terrorism guidelines. Furthermore, they unlawfully processed her personal data and issued threats of arrest unless she complied with their demands for information.
In light of this settlement, Murton has decided to donate her compensation to Palestinian causes. She expressed hopes that her experience would inspire more lawful protests in support of the Palestinian people. Her lawyer, Shamik Dutta, noted this case has historic significance, marking the first instance of a chief constable providing both an apology and financial compensation for unlawful policing linked to Palestine Action.
Aftermath and Broader Implications
The incident prompted a review of police protocols regarding protests, especially those related to politically sensitive topics like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. A spokesperson for Kent Police initially defended their actions but later clarified that similar future protests would not be criminalized under the Terrorism Act.
Murton’s experience serves as a pivotal reminder of the ongoing debates surrounding the right to protest and free speech in the face of heavy-handed policing. The public reaction to her case underscores the importance of protecting civil liberties, even amid controversial political climates.
