Downing Street Denies Allegations of Concealing Evidence in China Spy Trial as ‘Categorically Untrue’ – Live UK Politics Updates

Downing Street has categorically denied allegations that it concealed evidence related to the China spy trial, asserting such claims are ‘categorically untrue.’ This statement was delivered during a press briefing where the Prime Minister’s spokesperson responded to questions regarding the collapse of the prosecution case.

Key Assertions from Downing Street

The spokesperson emphasized that the government has upheld the responsibilities under the Official Secrets Act 1911. They clarified that the evidence cited was developed during the previous administration and adhered to the conditions relevant at the time of the alleged offenses.

• The government’s evidence was collected across various departments, aligning with previous stances on China.
• The Director of Public Prosecutions confirmed that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) acted independently.

Response to Specific Claims

Regarding specific allegations, the spokesperson rejected claims that Jonathan Powell, the national security adviser, sabotaged the prosecution. Claims of a meeting in September where it was allegedly decided that China could not be viewed as a threat were dismissed as false. No government official, including Powell, made any influencing decisions on evidence concerning the case.

Government’s Position on China

There has been a noted reluctance among successive governments to define China explicitly as a threat. However, the spokesperson acknowledged that China poses serious risks to the UK, mentioning increased instances of espionage and interference in British democratic processes.

Legislative Background

The spokesperson acknowledged the need for updates to the Official Secrets Act, which was highlighted in discussions about the role of the new National Security Act, suggesting it would facilitate prosecutions of similar offenses in the future.

Political Reactions

In Parliament, the collapse of the China spy prosecution has caused concerns among both the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties. Kemi Badenoch, the former Business Secretary, criticized the government’s handling of the situation, demanding clarity and accountability from ministers.

• Badenoch outlined six key questions for ministers regarding their involvement and the circumstances surrounding the CPS’s decision to drop the case.
• Concerns were also expressed in the House of Lords regarding the government’s commitment to addressing foreign espionage threats.

Conclusion

The collapse of the China spy trial has brought significant scrutiny to government actions and decisions concerning national security. As political discourse intensifies, calls for inquiries grow stronger, emphasizing the need for greater transparency and accountability.