Judge Interrupts Donna Adelson Highlighting Rising Grievances

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Donna Adelson, a notable figure in a high-profile murder case, was sentenced on October 13, 2025, for her role in the 2014 murder of Dan Markel, a law professor at Florida State University. In a courtroom filled with emotion, Adelson expressed her innocence while being reprimanded by Judge Stephen Everett.

Key Details of the Case

Donna Adelson became the fifth individual convicted in connection with the murder-for-hire plot against her former son-in-law, Dan Markel, who was shot outside his Tallahassee residence. Her son, Charlie Adelson, had previously faced conviction for the same charges.

Courtroom Proceedings

During her sentencing, Adelson delivered a tearful statement acknowledging Markel’s good character as a father and son-in-law. “Dan Markel was a fine and decent man,” she stated. However, she quickly shifted to proclaiming her innocence, asserting, “I had no knowledge that this horrible, evil act was going to take place.”

Judging her remarks, Judge Everett cautioned her, noting the “utter lack of remorse” displayed. He reminded her that the court would consider this aspect in the sentencing process.

Defense and Sentencing

The defense presented seven letters of support to Judge Everett, highlighting Adelson’s character as “kindhearted, generous, loving, and caring.” Despite these testimonials, Judge Everett sentenced her to life in prison without the possibility of parole, along with an additional 30 years for her convictions of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and solicitation.

Future Legal Actions

Following her conviction, Donna Adelson filed a motion for a new trial, which Judge Everett swiftly denied. This decision underscored the challenges Adelson faces as she seeks to overturn her life sentence.

Conclusion

The case of Donna Adelson is marked by rising grievances from her defense and family regarding the integrity of the judicial process. As her story unfolds, many continue to follow developments in this controversial legal battle.