Exploring the Quiet Alliance Between the Congressional Black Caucus and AIPAC

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) has long been considered the “conscience of Congress,” focusing on civil rights. Lately, its relationship with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has come under scrutiny. This quiet alliance raises questions about the CBC’s silence on Israel’s actions in Gaza.

International Court’s Landmark Ruling

Over a year ago, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) addressed a case by South Africa against Israel. The court deemed the claims of genocide in Gaza as “plausible.” Despite escalating international concern, the CBC has remained silent.

Reported Humanitarian Crisis

• 60,000 Palestinian deaths
• 1.9 million displaced
• 600,000 facing famine by September

These figures highlight the severity of the situation in Gaza. Multiple organizations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have identified these acts as genocidal.

Congressional Black Caucus and AIPAC

With over half of its members backed by AIPAC, CBC’s silence can be traced to financial ties. During the 2023–24 cycle, AIPAC spent over $4.6 million to endorse 26 CBC members. This financial support shifts CBC’s focus from its traditional civil rights mission.

AIPAC’s Political Influence

AIPAC’s influence expands beyond financing CBC members. It spent $17 million on GOP campaigns that opposed racial equality measures, reflecting a single-minded agenda to support Israel.

The Impact of Political Funding

This financial relationship raises concerns about CBC’s commitment to human rights. Critics argue that the influx of AIPAC money interrupts the caucus’s ability to support Black communities. Some members, like Cori Bush, have even lost their seats due to AIPAC-funded challenges.

Key Incidents of Intimidation

• Rabbis and Israeli human-rights groups oppose Gaza actions.
• Jamaal Bowman ousted after opposing AIPAC’s agenda.

This pattern showcases the extent of AIPAC’s influence in U.S. politics.

Future Pathways for the CBC

Despite backlash, some CBC members continue to advocate Palestinian rights. There is a call for the CBC to reassume its role as a moral leader in Congress.

Steps Forward

Rebuilding a coalition against AIPAC’s influence could reinstate CBC’s mission. By addressing this critical issue, the CBC could spearhead a movement for change.

The CBC faces a crucial decision. Should they maintain the status quo or lead a transformative movement? This decision will define their legacy and impact on civil rights advocacy.