Government reveals evidence in high-profile collapsed China spy case

In a significant development regarding the high-profile collapsed China spy case, new evidence has surfaced. The government has offered insights into the ongoing economic relationship with China while addressing accusations against two individuals. Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry faced charges related to espionage, but recent statements have shed light on the case’s collapse.

Background of the Case

Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry were charged under the Official Secrets Act in April 2024. These charges came during the Conservatives’ administration. The allegations included gathering and disseminating information detrimental to state security between December 2021 and February 2023.

Charges Dropped

Last month, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) unexpectedly dropped all charges against both men. This decision raised questions about the government’s commitment to transparency regarding national security threats.

Government Statements

In February 2025, a government statement emphasized the importance of maintaining a positive economic relationship with China. This statement followed an earlier document, which had been mistakenly attributed to 2024. The government clarified that this was an error regarding the timeline of the documents.

Official Position on Relations with China

• The government aims to engage in trade and investment while safeguarding security and values.
• This stance was reiterated in an August 2025 statement, further highlighting ongoing diplomatic efforts.

Collapse of the Case Explained

The Director of Public Prosecutions revealed that the case fell apart due to insufficient evidence linking China to national security threats at the time of the alleged incidents. Although evidence initially seemed adequate for prosecution, changes in the designation of China impacted the case’s viability.

Political Reactions

The Conservatives claim that the current government hesitated to present evidence to avoid harming relations with Beijing. In contrast, the Labour government contends that since the incidents occurred under the Conservatives’ watch, the prosecution must align with their perspective on China’s status as a threat.

During Prime Minister’s Questions, Sir Keir Starmer asserted that no ministers or advisors from the current government influenced the evidence provided for this case. As the situation develops, further clarity around national security and diplomatic relations with China remains imperative.