Palestine Action Ban Appeal Proceeds as Government Loses Block Attempt
In a recent development, the appeal process against the ban on Palestine Action is advancing as the government loses its attempt to block a judicial review. This follows significant public outcry and mounting demonstrations in support of the group.
Background of the Ban
Since the ban was enforced, over 2,100 individuals have been arrested during protests supporting Palestine Action. Demonstrators have been seen holding signs advocating for the group’s cause, such as “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.” Among these protestors, approximately 170 face charges for allegedly supporting the banned organization, with potential jail sentences of up to six months.
Judicial Review Process
The ban’s implications are serious, as any group proscribed by ministers can request to be “deproscribed” through a lengthy process managed by the Home Office. This review can extend for months and, if the ban is upheld, can lead to further judicial review by the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC). Consequently, groups looking to challenge their status may encounter a year or more of legal battles.
Legal Argument for Palestine Action
Lawyers representing Ms. Ammori argued that the special circumstances surrounding the ban necessitate an immediate review by the High Court. They contended that Parliament had not explicitly ruled out quicker methods to challenge such bans. Baroness Sue Carr, Lady Chief Justice, ruled that Ms. Ammori is justified in bringing her case against the decision to proscribe Palestine Action, providing her a faster legal avenue than the standard appeal process.
Implications of the Court’s Decision
- Judicial review offers a quicker challenge to the proscription of Palestine Action.
- This ruling allows for an authoritative judgment on the legality of the ban.
- The judgment could influence future criminal proceedings against individuals associated with Palestine Action.
A spokesperson for the Home Office responded to the ruling, stating that the department would evaluate the implications of the Court of Appeal’s decision. The spokesperson emphasized that Palestine Action’s activities, including allegations of criminal damage and violence, justify the ban. They reiterated that support for Palestine does not equate to endorsing a proscribed terrorist group.
Future Developments
Ms. Ammori noted that the government’s attempt to avoid judicial scrutiny has backfired, as the Court of Appeal enables her to challenge the ban on broader grounds. She expressed confidence heading into the judicial review scheduled for November, asserting that the legal standing for her case has improved significantly. Ms. Ammori emphasized that arresting peaceful protesters is a misuse of counter-terrorism resources.
