Government Loses Attempt to Prevent Appeal on Palestine Action Ban
The government has faced a setback in its efforts to prevent an appeal against the ban on Palestine Action. This ruling by the Court of Appeal allows for a review of the ban, which took effect on July 5, under terrorism laws. The outcome could have significant implications for how the law is applied to individuals who support the group.
Background of the Palestine Action Ban
Palestine Action was banned under terrorism laws, categorizing membership or support as a criminal offense. Since this ban, over 2,100 individuals have been arrested at various demonstrations. Many participants have shown their support for Palestine Action by holding signs that read, “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”
Judicial Review Granted
Co-founder Huda Ammori has gained permission for a judicial review of the home secretary’s decision to impose the ban. In a statement, she emphasized that the judicial review offers a favorable platform to contest the legality of the proscription.
Home Office Reaction
The Home Office acknowledged the Court of Appeal’s ruling but maintains that Palestine Action is still a prohibited group. A spokesperson reiterated that individuals supporting the group will face legal consequences.
Legal Framework for the Ban
The ban can be challenged through an intricate internal review process known as “deproscription” by the Home Office. However, this process can prolong the appeal for an extended period, potentially lasting over a year. The Court of Appeal supported a quicker judicial review instead of the lengthy deproscription process.
Significance of the Ruling
Baroness Sue Carr, the Lady Chief Justice, stated that allowing a judicial review would expedite the legal process regarding the ban. This decision may provide an authoritative judgement on the legality of the proscription, which could be influential in related criminal cases.
Public Support and Ongoing Campaigns
Ammori highlighted that the government’s attempt to halt judicial scrutiny had “backfired.” With further applications for judicial review scheduled for November, she feels strengthened in her position. The legal action emphasizes concerns regarding the use of counter-terrorism resources against peaceful protesters.
Looking Ahead
- The judicial review is set to proceed in November.
- Ammori plans to expand her case, presenting broader arguments against the ban.
- Public demonstrations advocating for the lifting of the ban continue to grow.
This ruling marks a critical moment in the ongoing legal battles surrounding Palestine Action and its supporters, shedding light on the complexities of terrorism laws and civil rights in the UK.
