Emotional Outburst as Court Mandates Destruction of XL Bully Simba
In a recent legal decision, a court mandated the destruction of an XL Bully dog named Simba, owned by Paul North. The hearing took place at Mold Magistrates Court, where North, a 50-year-old resident of Hoole Way in Chester, faced serious charges related to the possession of a fighting dog.
Background of the Case
The case began when police received information in December 2024 about North’s possession of Simba, who was allegedly not properly registered. Officers seized the dog on March 18, 2025, after determining that Simba exhibited aggressive behavior, making safe assessment difficult.
Court Proceedings
North had previously admitted to the offense but had his sentencing adjourned multiple times as the court considered possible housing solutions for Simba, should North regain custody. Prosecutor James Ashton detailed North’s extensive criminal history, which includes 37 previous convictions for a total of 60 offenses. He also outlined the associated costs incurred by North Wales Police for kenneling, transport, and callouts, totaling over £4,500.
- Kenneling costs: £4,334
- Callout fee: £93
- Transport cost: £68
Defense Arguments
Mike Pugh, representing North, argued that his client had taken necessary steps to ensure Simba was properly managed. Pugh indicated that while the dog was insured, registered, and neutered, North failed to complete the final step of obtaining a required certificate. He emphasized that there were no reports of aggression from Simba prior to the seizure.
Judge’s Decision
District Judge Gwyn Jones reviewed the evidence concerning Simba’s temperament. He noted that officers were unable to assess the dog due to its aggression, which included crashing into fences during evaluation attempts. The judge expressed concern regarding the potential danger Simba posed.
During the sentencing, North expressed his emotional distress, calling the judge a “nasty man” as he reacted to the decision. Ultimately, the court imposed a £500 fine on North, requiring him to pay £2,000 in kenneling fees, along with additional prosecution costs. The judge concluded that, given Simba’s temperament, an immediate destruction order was warranted.
Conclusion
This case highlights the ongoing legal and societal challenges surrounding the ownership of certain dog breeds, particularly those classified as fighting dogs. The court’s decision underscores the emphasis on public safety in cases involving aggressive animals.
