Connolly Grilled on Involvement in Bank Repossessions as Debate Kicks Off

ago 3 hours
Connolly Grilled on Involvement in Bank Repossessions as Debate Kicks Off

Catherine Connolly, an Independent candidate, faced serious scrutiny regarding her past as a barrister during a recent debate on RTÉ Primetime. This episode took place just days before the presidential election scheduled for Friday.

Debate Highlights: Connolly’s Legal Past Under Fire

In a tense exchange, Fine Gael candidate Heather Humphreys directly questioned Connolly about her involvement in bank repossessions. Connolly has been accused of facilitating the removal of people from their homes while representing financial institutions. The debate intensified when it was noted that an Irish Times journalist had tried to address this matter with Connolly seven times, to no avail.

Response from Connolly

Connolly refuted claims of evasion, asserting she has never failed to answer questions. However, she emphasized her obligation to confidentiality regarding specific cases. “Voters can expect openness and accountability from me,” she stated, highlighting the importance of separating government actions from judicial decisions.

  • Connolly’s emphasis: Barristers serve their clients to the best of their ability.
  • Criticism of government policy: Connolly blamed state regulations for housing issues.

Humphreys Challenges Connolly

In response to Connolly’s statements, Humphreys accused her of sidestepping the primary question about her representation of banks. “It’s a very simple question,” she insisted, reinforcing her stance on transparency.

Humphreys reminded the audience of Connolly’s previous criticisms of banks and repossession actions within local governance and legislative discussions. This contradiction led her to assert that Connolly was speaking “out of both sides of your mouth.”

Campaign Promises

During her opening remarks, Connolly presented her vision for a different Ireland, contrasting her values with those of Humphreys. She framed her candidacy around themes of compassion and solidarity.

  • Connolly’s stance: Represents a new approach to governance.
  • Humphreys’ promise: Stands for honesty and reliable service.

The debate underscored significant divides in the candidates’ platforms as they approach voters with just days remaining until the election.