US Officials Unite in Exclusive Push Against Trump’s ‘Deep State’ Battle
A coalition of federal officials has emerged to support former President Donald Trump’s agenda against perceived adversaries within the government. This effort, called the Interagency Weaponization Working Group (IWWG), has been active since at least May 2023 and includes members from key agencies like the CIA, FBI, and the Department of Justice.
Formation and Purpose of the Group
The IWWG’s formation follows an executive order issued by Trump on his inauguration day in January 2021. The order instructed the Attorney General to collaborate with other agencies to investigate alleged misconduct in the federal government concerning the “weaponization” of law enforcement and intelligence.
Key figures involved in this initiative include:
- Attorney General Pam Bondi
- Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard
They both announced efforts to “root out” individuals believed to have misused governmental power against Trump. This approach reflects a broader strategy to identify and act against what Trump and his supporters refer to as the “Deep State.”
Who is Involved?
Documents reviewed indicate nearly 40 officials from various federal agencies are engaged in this initiative. This includes representatives from:
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence
- Central Intelligence Agency
- Department of Defense
- Department of Homeland Security
- Internal Revenue Service
- Federal Communications Commission
Among the discussed targets within this framework are former officials from both the Obama and Biden administrations, notably:
- James Comey, former FBI Director
- Anthony Fauci, former chief medical advisor
- Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden
Group’s Objectives and Controversies
The IWWG aims to investigate past actions related to Trump’s impeachments, criminal prosecutions, and the 2016 election interference probe. Sources reported the group focuses on dismantling elements of the federal system perceived as hostile to Trump.
Discussions among group members have revolved around the treatment of January 6 rioters and the legal actions against Trump advisors like Steve Bannon. Moreover, the group is reportedly examining the role of certain military officials in vaccine mandates, suggesting a wider scope than initially anticipated.
Defense and Denial of Targeting Individuals
Despite the reported focus on specific individuals, senior officials within the IWWG, including ODNI representatives, denied any intentions to target individual personnel directly for retribution.
“If any investigations are conducted, they are based solely on available evidence concerning the alleged weaponization of government,” stated an ODNI official, emphasizing a fact-based approach rather than a retaliatory one.
Implications for the Future
The existence of the IWWG underscores the ongoing tensions within U.S. federal institutions and the polarization surrounding Trump’s legacy. As this group continues its discussions and initiatives, the full extent of its powers and implications for American governance remain to be seen.
Despite denials regarding specific targeting, the group’s formation has elicited concern across political lines, drawing scrutiny from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers regarding its mandate and workings. Such dynamics could set the stage for further debates on governmental transparency and accountability in the context of political rivalry.
