Justice Department Moves to Deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia to Liberia
The U.S. Justice Department announced plans to deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia to Liberia. This decision is linked to assurances from Liberia confirming their readiness to accept him. A filing in Maryland described the ongoing arrangements for his removal.
Details of Deportation Timeline
The Trump administration aims to deport Abrego Garcia by October 31. The department expressed confidence in the treatment of deported individuals in Liberia, stating that the nation is not on the list of countries Abrego Garcia fears.
Context of the Legal Battle
- Abrego Garcia has claimed that over 20 countries might persecute him if removed.
- His attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, criticized the decision, calling it punitive.
- Concerns were raised about Liberia potentially re-deporting him to El Salvador.
Previous Deportation Issues
Abrego Garcia was previously removed to El Salvador in March 2023 despite legal protection that should have prevented his deportation due to risks of gang violence. The error in his removal was acknowledged by immigration officials.
A federal judge ordered his return to the U.S., which occurred in June after he faced criminal charges in Tennessee. He was released from custody in August and returned to Maryland.
Subsequent Legal Proceedings
Upon return, Abrego Garcia was detained again by immigration authorities in Baltimore. The administration initially considered deporting him to several countries, including Uganda, Eswatini, and Ghana, but none agreed to accept him.
Abrego Garcia has expressed a preference for Costa Rica, indicating it as a potential safe haven. However, the Justice Department has not pursued this option.
Current Judicial Considerations
Judge Paula Xinis is currently evaluating Abrego Garcia’s situation, including the legality of his continued detention. She has prohibited the administration from proceeding with his deportation as she reviews the case.
The advocacy from his legal team continues as they seek to ensure his protection from potential dangers associated with deportation. This legal battle reflects broader immigration policy challenges and the complexities of asylum claims in the U.S.
