Scholar sues Steve Coogan over Richard III film claims no apology received

A significant legal dispute has arisen surrounding the film *The Lost King*, which depicts the discovery of King Richard III’s remains in Leicester. Richard Taylor, a university academic and figure portrayed in the film, is receiving “substantial damages” following a High Court ruling regarding his representation.

Claims Against Steve Coogan and Production Companies

Richard Taylor expressed his dismay, stating he was never consulted during the film’s production. He only became aware of his portrayal after receiving a phone call while on holiday, and later persuaded the producers to allow him to view a preview of the movie.

The court found that Taylor was depicted inaccurately, being labeled as “smug, unduly dismissive and patronising.” The film suggested he “knowingly” misled the public, which he vehemently denied. Taylor remarked, “I’m portrayed by someone who looks like me, but behaves in a way inconsistent with my standards.”

Reputation Damage and Fallout

Following the film’s release, Taylor faced severe backlash, receiving hostile emails from the public. Some people called him a “disgrace” and told him to “rot in hell.” He expressed frustration that a project meant to showcase British academic excellence turned him into a villain.

As the Chief Operating Officer at Loughborough University, Taylor criticized the producers for failing to check any facts before the film’s release. He stated that both Steve Coogan and the production companies, Baby Cow and Pathe Productions, did not contact him prior to launching the film.

Settlement and Future Implications

The case, initially set for trial, was settled during a High Court hearing, leading to an agreement where the film will include an on-screen clarification. This clarification will inform viewers that the character based on Richard Taylor is fictitious and did not accurately represent his behavior.

Despite receiving damages, Taylor expressed disappointment that no scenes would be cut from the film. He stated, “I’d have liked them to re-edit the film, but one’s got to be realistic.” He added, “The film’s going to look pretty silly” with the new clarification.

Coogan’s Response

Steve Coogan responded to the settlement by highlighting the contributions of Philippa Langley, emphasizing her role in the discovery of King Richard III. However, Taylor countered Coogan’s statements, questioning the accuracy of the claims made about the historical narrative presented in the film. He remarked, “Basic facts were not checked,” which he believed was crucial to the film’s integrity.

• Film: The Lost King
• Subject: Discovery of King Richard III
• Key Figures: Richard Taylor, Steve Coogan, Philippa Langley
• Settlement: Substantial damages paid, on-screen clarification to be added

The outcome of this case underscores the importance of accuracy in storytelling, particularly when it involves real individuals and historical events. As the industry continues to create and adapt narratives from history, the responsibility to portray facts with integrity remains paramount.