FBI Criticizes House Plan to Appoint Gabbard in Counterintelligence Role
The FBI has expressed strong disapproval of a House proposal that would alter its role in counterintelligence efforts. This proposal suggests transferring authority from the FBI to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), led by Tulsi Gabbard. The FBI’s concerns center around potential confusion and threats to national security.
FBI’s Strong Objection
In an unclassified letter to Congress, the FBI declared its “strong objection” to the proposed changes. The bureau highlighted its extensive experience in counterintelligence, citing 53 field offices nationwide dedicated to foreign espionage countermeasures. The letter stated that handing over responsibilities to officials without relevant expertise could endanger national security.
Concerns Over Proposed Changes
- The proposal could create unnecessary bureaucracy.
- Decision-making may shift to individuals not actively involved in counterintelligence operations.
- The potential risks include inconsistent mitigation strategies against espionage.
This clash underscores rising tensions between Gabbard and other intelligence officials. Gabbard has previously faced scrutiny for her management style, including unexpected actions regarding security clearances that involved the CIA.
Intelligence Agency Response
Other intelligence agencies, including the CIA, also have reservations about the House proposal. Sources indicate a consensus among officials that transferring counterintelligence authority could compromise safety and effectiveness.
Joint Statement from Agencies
In response to the ongoing debate, both the ODNI and the FBI released a joint statement. They emphasized their commitment to collaborating with Congress to strengthen counterintelligence efforts.
Legislative Context
Currently, lawmakers are debating an intelligence policy bill. The House version would empower Gabbard to oversee counterintelligence activities, though it lacks clear definitions for these amendments. The Senate amendment does not include a shift in authority to the ODNI.
Key Legislative Questions
The FBI letter raised important questions regarding the implications of the House bill:
- Would counterintelligence prosecutions require new approvals?
- Could this shift authority over investigations from the FBI and Department of Justice?
These unanswered questions have led to concerns about increased confusion among intelligence agencies.
Expert Perspectives
Senator Mark Warner, vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has signaled openness to reviewing counterintelligence management while resisting any dismantling of the FBI’s leading role. He stressed the need for the ODNI to act as a supportive entity rather than a competing force.
Meanwhile, House Intelligence Committee Chair Rick Crawford lauded the proposed changes as significant reform for the nation’s counterintelligence efforts, which he believes have fallen behind in the face of threats from foreign adversaries.
Historical Context
The director of national intelligence position was established after the September 11, 2001, attacks. Its goal was to facilitate better coordination among U.S. intelligence agencies and improve the sharing of information.
