Perry Hall Denny’s Controversy Sparks Clash Among Neighbors, Developers, and County Politics
The controversy surrounding the proposed Denny’s diner in Perry Hall is escalating, involving community concerns, developer interests, and political implications. Neighbors express fears about the potential disturbances a 24-hour diner may bring to their residential area.
Perry Hall Denny’s Proposal Concerns Local Residents
The proposed 24-hour Denny’s at The Shops at Perry Hall has sparked significant opposition from local residents. Daniel Williams, a nearby resident, voiced his concerns during a council hearing, stating that the diner would cause excessive noise at late hours, disrupting the neighborhood’s livability.
Political Reactions and Proposed Legislation
In response to community objections, Republican Councilman David Marks has introduced legislation aiming to limit the diner’s operating hours. Marks proposes that Denny’s cease operations from 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. Currently, zoning laws permit the diner to operate around the clock.
Paul Mazza, president of Rommel Companies, which intends to develop the diner, highlighted the significant financial investments already made in planning and design. He criticized the legislative proposal as a direct impediment to their business plans.
Community Voices and Developer’s Stance
During the public hearing, Councilman Marks questioned David Altfeld, a partner in The Shops at Perry Hall, about his perspective on local residents’ concerns. Altfeld expressed frustration, feeling that the project had received prior approval and was thus unfairly facing new challenges.
Baltimore County Executive Kathy Klausmeier’s administration warned that Marks’ legislation might deter future development projects in the county. Deputy Director of Government Affairs Brad Kroner argued that altering rules mid-process undermines business investments and could lead to potential legal action against the county for targeting a specific development.
Debate Over Councilmanic Courtesy
The hearing also addressed the concept of councilmanic courtesy, where council members traditionally defer to the representative of an impacted district. Businessman Robert Latshaw and other critics urged the council to prioritize the county’s overall welfare over individual interests. Nick Stewart from the good government group We The People-Baltimore County emphasized that council members should independently evaluate each project without bias.
In contrast, Councilman Marks defended his approach, arguing that local representatives are best positioned to advocate for their communities’ needs. Councilman Izzy Patoka remained undecided, balancing the importance of community input against the benefits for local businesses.
Future Implications and Scheduled Vote
With the vote on the proposed legislation scheduled for Monday, Councilman Julian Jones, who is also vying for the county executive position, indicated he could not support Marks’ bill, citing a need for compromise. Jones believes that Denny’s offers a wholesome dining option, potentially alleviating some neighborhood concerns.
Marks has expressed a willingness to amend his legislation in pursuit of a mutually acceptable solution before the upcoming vote, highlighting the ongoing struggle between developers and community interests.
