Chrishell from ‘Selling Sunset’ Breaks Reality TV’s Secret Rule
Reality television has a set of unspoken rules, especially concerning the portrayal of castmates. Among these, one stands out: do not publicly tarnish fellow cast members’ reputations or their businesses. Chrishell Stause, known for her role in the Netflix series “Selling Sunset,” recently found herself at the center of controversy for breaking this rule.
Chrishell Stause’s Bold Statement
The tension unfolded during the reunion special for “Selling Sunset” following its ninth season. Stause’s comments regarding her former friend and castmate, Emma Hernan, sparked significant backlash. Stause referred to Hernan’s on-again, off-again boyfriend, Blake Davis, and made serious allegations about his comments on social issues. This post, made via social media, seemed poised to negatively impact Hernan’s brand.
Details of the Incident
- Stause’s post mentioned Davis’s alleged derogatory comments regarding pronouns and the N-word.
- Hernan expressed that Stause’s remarks led to personal attacks against her online, calling it an “attack.”
- The situation escalated on stage, with Hernan confronting Stause about the intent behind her statements.
Reactions from Castmates
During the reunion, many cast members sided with Hernan. Chelsea Lazkani notably suggested that Stause needed to acknowledge her accountability for her actions. Stause, while demonstrating reluctance to accept full responsibility, issued a vague apology for repeating Davis’s words on social media.
The Impact on Hernan’s Business
Hernan, a real estate agent and the owner of a frozen empanada brand, shared her distress over the ramifications of Stause’s comments on her business. She stated explicitly that Stause knew the potential for harm. This reveals the complexities involved when personal matters intersect with professional ones in reality television.
Understanding Reality TV Dynamics
This incident highlights the challenging balance reality stars must maintain. They aim to present authentic narratives while safeguarding their business ventures. The underlying theme is clear: while gossip is a currency in the reality genre, protecting one’s business interests must come first.
The expectations are paradoxical. Cast members can air grievances against each other, but when personal brands are at stake, lines must not be crossed. This tension is evident not only in “Selling Sunset” but in various reality shows, illustrating the broader social contract amongst reality television stars.
Conclusion
The drama encapsulated in Stause’s remarks and the subsequent fallout emphasizes a crucial reality: reality TV thrives on conflict, yet the stakes are much higher for those involved. Their livelihoods depend on the balance they find between authenticity and the protection of their brands.
