Council concerned over employee’s alleged misuse of funds for diesel drums WRC informed

ago 3 hours
Council concerned over employee’s alleged misuse of funds for diesel drums WRC informed

A recent case involving Michael Walsh, a former employee of Galway County Council, has raised concerns about the suspected misuse of public funds. Walsh was dismissed from his position as a general services supervisor after an internal investigation revealed he had misappropriated over €1,600 in diesel purchased with council funds.

Details of the Misconduct

Walsh was employed by the council since 2013, overseeing a team of six. His actions came to light following queries about specific payments connected to fuel purchases for council vehicles in January 2023. The investigation was initiated by administration staff in Clifden who noticed discrepancies in payments made with a council-supplied payment card.

Investigative Findings

  • Walsh utilized a council payment card for buying fuel on three occasions instead of the designated fuel card.
  • He admitted to using the payment card for personal fuel purchases, totaling €446.80.
  • Further inquiries found more suspicious transactions, with unauthorized fuel purchases amounting to €1,217 linked to council cards.
  • The inquiry also determined that additional transactions of €652.25 indicated inappropriate use of these cards.

Moreover, evidence suggested that the amount of fuel purchased surpassed the capacity of the vehicle Walsh claimed to fuel, raising further alarms about potential misuse.

Outcomes of the Inquiry

The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruled against Walsh’s claim of unfair dismissal. The hearing highlighted his own admissions and the substantial evidence against him. Despite his defense, which indicated a lack of personal gain from the purchases, the WRC found significant grounds for dismissal.

Impact on Employment

Walsh’s employment was officially terminated in February 2023. He expressed his distress during the investigation, claiming that the allegations had damaged both his and his family’s reputation. His representative argued that the dismissal was disproportionate, citing his clean disciplinary history.

However, the adjudicator affirmed that Walsh had ample opportunities to explain his actions. The WRC concluded that his explanations did not absolve him of responsibility for the misuse of public funds.

Conclusion

This case underscores the critical nature of accountability within public service roles and highlights the importance of adhering to financial protocols. The decision by the WRC serves as a reminder of the serious implications of misusing public resources.