Psychiatrist Uncovers Shocking Findings After Studying Nazi Officials Post-War But Gains No Supporters
James Vanderbilt, an accomplished screenwriter, has recently delved into a significant historical narrative. His adaptation, based on the book by Jack El-Hai, explores the complex interactions between Hermann Göring and Douglas Kelley, an American psychiatrist. This relationship unfolded during preparations for the Nuremberg trials, a pivotal moment in post-World War II history.
The Nuremberg Trials: A Historical Overview
The Nuremberg trials began in November 1945, following Germany’s surrender in May of the same year. These trials aimed to hold 22 senior Nazi officials accountable for their actions during the war. Key figures included Winston Churchill, who advocated for execution, and Franklin Roosevelt, who authorized death warrants. In contrast, Chief U.S. Prosecutor Robert Jackson emphasized the importance of a fair trial.
- Winston Churchill: Proposed execution of Nazi leaders.
- Franklin Roosevelt: Signed execution orders, including for Göring.
- Robert Jackson: Pioneered the International Military Tribunal and fair trial principles.
Douglas Kelley: The Psychiatrist’s Role
Douglas Kelley was tasked with assessing whether the defendants, including Göring, could comprehend the proceedings. This assignment required significant psychological insights and the ability to navigate complex personalities. Kelley aimed to understand the motivations behind the Nazis’ actions to prevent future atrocities.
A Complicated Rapport
As Kelley worked closely with Göring, a unique rapport developed. Kelley sought to comprehend the mindset of his patient while also aspiring to write a bestseller about his experiences. However, their interactions led to ethical dilemmas, including the unauthorized delivery of letters to Göring’s family.
Conflicts and Challenges
The relationship between Kelley and his fellow psychiatrist, Gustave Gilbert, also added complexity to the environment at Nuremberg. Gilbert’s differing viewpoints on the nature of the Nazi officials led to tension, culminating in a physical altercation. Their conflicting observations highlighted the varying psychological interpretations of the defendants.
Letters and Family Dynamics
A pivotal aspect of Kelley’s experience involved his interactions with Göring’s family. Despite Army regulations, Kelley became a courier for Göring’s letters to his wife and daughter. This ultimately raised ethical questions about confidentiality and duty, especially following the arrest of Göring’s family.
The Aftermath of the Trials
After the trials, the fates of the Göring family took various turns. Initially separated, Göring’s wife and daughter were later reunited, thanks in part to Kelley’s interventions. These personal stories within the broader historical context of the trials reveal the human side of a significant moment in history.
Conclusion: A Legacy of Understanding
Kelley’s findings about the personalities of Nazi officials sparked controversy and reflection. His experiences at the Nuremberg trials revealed shocking insights about the nature of evil and complicity. While Kelley may not have garnered the widespread support he sought, his work continues to resonate in discussions about morality and justice in a post-war world.
