High School Teacher Convicted of Sexually Exploiting Student
Elie Amram, a physical education teacher, has been convicted of sexually exploiting a 16-year-old student at a high school in Montreal. The conviction, delivered in October 2023, stemmed from events that took place in 2011. The teacher, then 29, had developed a sexual relationship with the student while in a position of authority.
Details of the Case
The victim testified that she had several intimate encounters with Amram, which included a sexual act in the gymnasium’s garage. These incidents occurred while she was in her fifth year of high school. The judge, Éric de Champlain, refuted Amram’s claims that the relationship was platonic, noting that he had chosen to pursue the student inappropriately.
- Defendant: Elie Amram, 43 years old at the time of conviction.
- Relationship: Began when the victim was 16 years old and in 5th secondary.
- Location: Royal Vale High School, Montreal.
- Sexual Act: First reported incident occurred in a school gym garage.
- Legal Outcome: Convicted of sexual exploitation.
Background of the Case
Amram had been teaching for several years at the Royal Vale High School under the English Montreal School Board when he was arrested in 2022. His teaching license has been revoked following the allegations. During the trial, the victim described feeling immense pressure after her encounters with Amram, especially as she later faced an important math exam. She recounted initially feeling affection for him but ended up attributing significant emotional weight to their secret relationship.
Legal Proceedings and Judgment
The court found Amram’s defense lacking credibility. He attempted to portray himself as a victim while minimizing the impact of his actions on the student. However, the judge emphasized that the student was entitled to protection and support, not exploitation.
- Judge: Éric de Champlain
- Defense Attorney: Me Jacklin Turcot
- Prosecution Attorney: Me Andréanne Marion
The judge concluded that Amram’s testimony was full of inconsistencies and did not raise reasonable doubt. The victim’s account, though not flawless, was accepted as truthful. Sentencing for Amram is pending, with discussions scheduled to occur in the coming weeks.
Conclusion
This case highlights the severe consequences of exploiting positions of authority in educational settings. The forthcoming sentencing will determine the extent of the penalties Amram will face for his actions against a vulnerable student.
