House of Lords Scandal: Lord Dannatt and Lord Evans Face Suspensions in Cash for Access Sting
Two members of the House of Lords are facing suspensions due to a cash for access scandal involving interactions with undercover journalists. Lord Dannatt, a former British Army chief, and Lord Evans of Watford were found to have violated rules about providing parliamentary services for financial gain.
Details of the Scandal
The House of Lords Conduct Committee determined that both peers broke regulations prohibiting the exchange of parliamentary services for “payment or reward.” Lord Evans is set to be suspended for five months, while Lord Dannatt faces a four-month suspension. Their penalties will take effect after approval by the House of Commons.
Lord Dannatt’s Violations
- Engaged in discussions with undercover journalists, showing openness to potential paid parliamentary services.
- Provided parliamentary services for payment in three separate instances.
- Corresponded with ministers and officials on behalf of companies where he has financial interests.
- Specifically involved with UK Mitrogen, Teledyne UK, and Blue International Holdings.
The Conduct Committee expressed that the number of breaches and their ongoing nature over two years justified substantial sanctions against Lord Dannatt. Although he showed remorse, four distinct violations were noted.
Lord Evans’s Conduct
- Accused of soliciting cash for access by meeting with undercover reporters from The Guardian.
- Held a third of the shares in Affinity, the company involved in the meetings.
- Failed to uphold his personal honour by expressing willingness to connect undercover reporters with MPs.
- Sponsored events at the House of Lords that promoted Affinity, violating event rules.
The commissioner ruled that the events were mismanaged as tickets were sold above cost, undermining the integrity of the House of Lords.
Responses and Statements
Lord Dannatt commented on the findings, expressing regret for his actions. He acknowledged that ignorance of the Code of Conduct cannot serve as a defense and accepted the consequences of his breaches.
He famously stated, “At nearly 75, no one is too old to learn lessons,” emphasizing his commitment to public service despite the violations.
This development raises significant concerns about accountability and ethics within the House of Lords. The implications of these suspensions will resonate within the political community as further scrutiny of similar practices emerges.
