Government Officials Rally Behind Gustavo Petro After Daughter’s Sweden Incident: ‘What an Outrage!’
Recent events in Sweden involving Gustavo Petro’s family have sparked widespread condemnation among government officials. The controversy revolves around incidents involving the Colombian president’s minor daughter, Antonella Petro. This situation has been framed as a media and political persecution that crosses borders, endangering the privacy and wellbeing of minors.
Government Support for Gustavo Petro
The outrage began after videos emerged featuring the First Lady, Verónica Alcocer, and her daughter during their stay in Stockholm. These clips prompted immediate reactions from high-ranking officials. Many characterized the incident as an unacceptable violation of privacy that unjustly targeted a minor.
- Irene Vélez, the Minister of Environment, labeled it as “violence against women, adolescents, and girls,” urging authorities to condemn such actions.
- Education Minister Daniel Rojas called the events an “infamy,” reinforcing the notion of political and personal persecution.
- Felipe Durán, Superintendent of Public Services, expressed his disapproval of the ongoing harassment faced by the president and his family.
Details of the Incident
President Petro revealed details on social media, stating that Antonella was followed from Colombia to Sweden. Upon her arrival, she was recorded by Swedish journalists from Expressen, who had previously reported on Alcocer’s life. Petro stressed that the footage showed Antonella not leaving a luxury store, but rather returning to her lodging following her trip from Bogotá.
The president deemed the actions of the media as crossing a line. “My daughter, who is a minor, has been subjected to profiling since her departure from Colombia,” he stated, illustrating the serious implications of such media behavior.
First Lady’s Encounter with Reporters
The situation intensified when Verónica Alcocer was approached by Expressen journalists while shopping. She opted not to respond to their inquiries, citing a language barrier, while her companion, Catalan businessman Manuel Grau, intervened to protect their privacy.
Petro reiterated his concerns about the impact of these images on minors and demanded higher ethical standards from media outlets, emphasizing that not all tactics are justifiable in political discourse.
Conclusion
The ongoing support from government officials reflects a unified stance against what they perceive as unjust targeting of the president’s family. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the intersection of privacy, media ethics, and the well-being of minors in the public eye.
