Oklahoma Student Reports Discrimination after Failing Gender Essay by Trans Instructor
A student at the University of Oklahoma, Samantha Fulnecky, has reported discrimination following her failure to pass an essay in a psychology course taught by a transgender instructor. Fulnecky failed to address the assignment prompt, which focused on societal perceptions related to gender while predominantly arguing against the existence of multiple genders based on biblical beliefs.
Background of the Incident
In her approximately 650-word essay, Fulnecky presented her views on gender, repeatedly citing the Bible to support her arguments. The essay was intended to respond to an article about gender stereotypes. However, Fulnecky’s submission largely neglected to engage with the source material and relied heavily on personal beliefs instead of empirical evidence.
The course’s instructor, Mel Curth, who uses “she/they” pronouns, graded Fulnecky harshly. The central concerns included the lack of relevant content and the essay’s reliance on personal ideology. Curth noted that Fulnecky’s comments, describing the belief in multiple genders as “demonic,” were particularly offensive to marginalized communities.
Instructors’ Feedback
- Curth emphasized the importance of empathy and perspective in academic writing.
- Megan Waldron, a graduate student teaching another section of the same course, supported Curth’s grading and criticized Fulnecky’s dismissive tone towards her peers.
Waldron pointed out that constructive disagreement is essential and should be conveyed respectfully. She expressed concern over Fulnecky’s outlook regarding teasing as a harmful aspect of gender identity discussion.
University’s Response
In light of Fulnecky’s allegations of discrimination based on her religious beliefs, the University of Oklahoma announced that a “graduate student instructor” had been placed on administrative leave pending investigation. However, specific details about Curth or Waldron’s employment statuses remain unclear as the university did not disclose their names in official communications.
Key Points
- Fulnecky’s essay received a failing grade for not adhering to the assignment prompt.
- Curth faced administrative scrutiny following the discrimination allegations made by Fulnecky.
- The incident has sparked discussions about religious expression and academic standards in the classroom.
The situation has raised important questions about the intersection of academic freedom, personal beliefs, and the responsibilities of educators in addressing sensitive topics such as gender and identity. As investigations proceed, the university aims to maintain an inclusive and respectful learning environment for all students.
